Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's general score of 82.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy S20 is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G 5G Plus takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a camera with a way better resolution and a larger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.