Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G100, with a global score of 94.8 against 88.9. The Galaxy S20 is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G100, but Samsung was able to make it notably lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Moto G100 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid display than Moto G100, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Moto G100 has a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G100 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Moto G100 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Motorola Moto G100 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G100 also counts with faster video frame rate, a larger aperture and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.