Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a 94.8 score against 86.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy S20 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, despite of the fact that it was released around 21 months before.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Moto G200 5G counts with a processor that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy S20's CPU, and although the Moto G200 5G has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S20 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G200 5G takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.