Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-12-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is way better than the Moto G51 5G, with a 94.8 score against 77.8. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S20 construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Moto G51 5G, even though it was released about 22 months before.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a better screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels number in each screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G51 5G, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G51 5G has better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Moto G51 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G51 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.