Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is better than Motorola Moto G60, with a general score of 94.8 against 79.5. The Galaxy S20 is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G60, but Samsung was able to make it incredibly thinner and notably lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola Moto G60 has Android 11, so it provides you some extra features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a sharper screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G60 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G60 also counts with faster 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Moto G60 counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.