Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than the Motorola Moto G60s, having a overall score of 94.8 against 79.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a somewhat thinner and a lot lighter phone than the Motorola Moto G60s.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Moto G60s has a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G60s also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Moto G60s features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video definition, the Moto G60s also has a lot better resolution camera, better video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.