Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is better than Moto G71 5G, with a score of 94.8 against 82.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11. Even though the Galaxy S20 is older than the Moto G71 5G, it's body is a little bit lighter and a little thinner. Galaxy S20 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid display than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater display pixels density. The Galaxy S20 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G71 5G counts with better battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.