Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola Moto G9 Power, with a global score of 94.8 against 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction is thinner and much lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, despite of the fact that it was released only 9 months before. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit superior CPU than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 has a lot better screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a way better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Moto G9 Power counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video definition, the Moto G9 Power also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a lot higher resolution camera in the back. Galaxy S20 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.