Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a 94.8 score against 75.8. The Galaxy S20 body is newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has older 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores and 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 counts with slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.