Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's global score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is noticeably thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S20 has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S20 captures better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S20 also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images and video, a lot higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S20 costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.