Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a 94.8 score against 77.4. Even though Galaxy S20 is much newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's extremely thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S20 has a better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a greater screen density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 captures better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a lot higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z2 Play, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.