Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Galaxy S20's body is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, but it is thicker and a bit heavier. Galaxy S20 counts with a much better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S20 has a little bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with longer battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than the Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.