Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is much better than Motorola One 5G Ace's overall score of 81.6. The Galaxy S20 is an older phone than Motorola One 5G Ace, but it is notably thinner and notably lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S20 has a bit better processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One 5G Ace takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a back facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.