Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than the Motorola One Action's score of 78.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 and Motorola One Action were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S20 is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Motorola One Action features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S20, both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and the same internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S20 has a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Galaxy S20 counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Action. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One Action, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.