Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 566 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a global score of 94.8 against 79.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.