Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10. Galaxy S20's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even when both were released only 8 months apart.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Galaxy S20 has a bit better processing unit than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size back camera sensor, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 costs a lot more money than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.