Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when the Galaxy S20 and nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy S20 is extremely lighter and thinner.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S20. They have 8 CPU cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has more storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has longer battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.