Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 overall score. The Galaxy S20 construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though both of them were released with only 2 months difference. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy S20 one, they have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 7% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.