Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's general score of 79.4. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. Although the Galaxy S20 is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is lighter and a little bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Galaxy A35 5G takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and better video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A35 5G features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.