Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than Galaxy A50, with a 94.8 score against 83.8. Although the Galaxy S20 is just a little thicker than the Galaxy A50, it's a little bit lighter and newer. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 and Samsung Galaxy A50 both have similar batteries duration.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A50, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.