Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a little bit better than Galaxy A52 5G, having a 94.8 score against 91.3. Even though Galaxy S20 is older than the Galaxy A52 5G, it's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S20 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a higher pixel density. Galaxy S20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 0.59 inches sensor and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back facing camera with much more MP and higher 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.