Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A52s, with a overall score of 94.8 against 91.1. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Galaxy A52s has Android 11, so it offers lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older phone than the Galaxy A52s, but Samsung could make it just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy S20 features a slightly better display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same camera aperture and a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has better video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A52s features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.