Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's score of 88.1. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body is thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy F62, although it was released a little bit further than a year before.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S20 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Galaxy F62 features a much better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a camera in the back with lot more MP and faster video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.