Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is way better than the Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. Samsung Galaxy S20's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy M20. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy S20 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy M20 features longer battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.