Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 566 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M51, with a 94.8 score against 87.7. Galaxy S20 is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M51, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M51 has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit better processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 has a brighter display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with faster 30 fps video frame rates and a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy S20 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.