Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-04-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Galaxy M53 5G, having a 94.8 score against 76.7. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a way older and just a bit thicker cellphone than Galaxy M53 5G, but Samsung could make it just a bit lighter anyway.
Galaxy S20 has an extremely better processor than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a greater screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a camera with way less mega-pixels, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy S20 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy M53 5G has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.