Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with a general score of 94.8 against 80.4. Galaxy S20's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a little bit higher screen density, a little bigger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way larger sensor and a much better video definition.
Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.