Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's global score of 77.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is way thinner and lighter. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy S20 features a sharper display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.