Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 566 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 94.8 score against 80.1. The Galaxy S20 is a way lighter and much thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both were only released 1 months apart. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S20 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Galaxy S20 count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density.
Galaxy S20 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way higher video quality and a much larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 is also cheaper than the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.