Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip, having a overall score of 94.8 against 88.5. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. The Galaxy S20 design is lighter but just a little thicker than Galaxy Z Flip, and they were released with only a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy S20 and Galaxy Z Flip feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S20 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 also has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S20 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.