Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a score of 94.8 against 85.6. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version, giving some extra features and performance optimizations. Galaxy S20's body is lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it is somewhat thicker and was released just 17 months before.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. Galaxy S20 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have the same resolution back-facing camera and a same size camera aperture. Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 costs the same than Galaxy Z Flip 3, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.