Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-06 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than Xperia XZs's 77.2 general score. The Galaxy S20 is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Xperia XZs, but it's a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a better pixels number per screen inch.
Galaxy S20 counts with a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xperia XZs shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a much smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and better video frame rate.
The Galaxy S20 is a lot more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZs, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.