Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's global score of 82.9. The Galaxy S20 body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, even though both were released with only 5 months difference. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of display. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's processing unit is very similar to Galaxy S20's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate and a way more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy S20 features a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy S20's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.