Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-03-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's 90.7 score. Galaxy S20's construction is incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has Android 11, giving you some nice extra features.
Galaxy S20 has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better screen than Galaxy S20, because although it has a quite worse pixels amount in each inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1440 x 3200 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same 24 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy S20 has a better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has greater battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.