Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 566 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, getting a global score of 94.8 against 84.3. Galaxy S20's design is a lot lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it's thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a way lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 2224 x 2488 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better performing processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same 24 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video, a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has improved battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.