Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 566 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a global score of 94.8 against 81.6. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a way lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even when they were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count in each screen inch and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition and a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and faster video frame rates.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.