Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2022-01-11 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, having a 93.3 score against 89.1. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S21 FE were released with only 4 months difference, Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction is heavier but also just a little bit thinner. Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy S21 FE comes with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a little better number of pixels per inch of display. IPhone 13 Pro's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE one, they have equal internal memory capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy S21 FE has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 45 percent larger battery capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 13 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S21 FE. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.