Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's construction is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 4's, although it is just a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a processor that's very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy S21 FE, both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per screen inch. Galaxy S21 FE has a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S21 FE features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition, a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with lesser MP.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.