Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-01-11 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE is just a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ, having a general score of 89.1 against 81. Galaxy S21 FE's body has the same thickness than LG G7 ThinQ, but it's a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S21 FE has the previous 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S21 FE has a little better hardware performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG G7 ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG G7 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.