Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-01-11 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a global score of 89.1 against 82.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is notably newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's just a bit heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has the previous 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has just a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ's camera is just as good as the Galaxy S21 FE one, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
LG V30S ThinQ features much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21 FE counts with improved battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.