Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has an overall score of 89.1, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE construction is newer, but just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Galaxy S21 FE, both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better low light photos.
Galaxy S21 FE has improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.