Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S21 FE has newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S21 FE body is notably newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it is a little heavier and a bit thicker.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a higher pixel number per inch in the screen. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ features a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy S21 FE's CPU, they have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V40 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy S21 FE features superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S21 FE, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.