Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| -- | Blue and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having an 89.1 score against 87.6. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and way lighter than LG V60 ThinQ. LG V60 ThinQ features a processing unit that's very similar to the CPU in Galaxy S21 FE, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S21 FE has a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little greater display density. The LG V60 ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much higher video definition.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S21 FE, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.