Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's general score of 80.9. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Galaxy S21 FE has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Even though the Galaxy S21 FE and the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra were released only 8 months apart, the Galaxy S21 FE is a bit thinner and lighter.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Galaxy S21 FE one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.