Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung managed to make it lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery life is just as good as the Galaxy S21 FE one. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.