Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Surfing blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, with an 89.1 score against 82.6. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's body is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. Galaxy S21 FE has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a quite smaller display, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little less pixels per inch in the display.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a superior camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.