Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is incredibly newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S21 FE has a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.