Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a score of 89.1 against 77.4. Even though Galaxy S21 FE is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's much thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S21 FE has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a bit better pixel density, a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Moto Z2 Play has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE captures clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also counts with faster video frame rate. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.