Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-01-11 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is much better than Moto Z3, getting an 89.1 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a much newer phone than the Moto Z3, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because it has a little better pixel density, a bit bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto Z3, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.