Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Oxford blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is slightly better than the Motorola One 5G, with an 89.1 score against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola One 5G. The Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S21 FE features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Motorola One 5G counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One 5G. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One 5G, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.